[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Qemu-devel] qemu simple user mode testing (arm, ppc, sparc)

From: Yelich, Scott D.
Subject: RE: [Qemu-devel] qemu simple user mode testing (arm, ppc, sparc)
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:20:22 -0500

Unfortunately, I'm not a coder... but I would love to see qemu on the zaurus 
I'm monitoring this list for any news on the ARM (and sparc?) front.


-----Original Message-----
From: Karel Gardas [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 7:59 AM
To: QEMU Development Mailing List
Subject: [Qemu-devel] qemu simple user mode testing (arm, ppc, sparc)


I have performed simple testing of qemu-0.5.2 (vide also my last email
about ARM emulation issues). I have used these tests:

1) C++ hello world example using iostreams
2) C++ hello world example using C stdio
3) C hello world example using C stdio
4) bogomips test

Tests 1-3 were tested in two versions, one linked dynamically and one

The results are (grouped by qemu-<processor>)


1) stat: failed
   dyn: failed
2) stat: run
   dyn: failed
3) stat: run
   dyn: failed
4) run (160 BogoMIPS -- very good!)


1) stat: failed
   dyn: failed (qemu segfaults)
2) stats: run
   dyn: failed (qemu segfaults)
3) stat: run
   dyn: run
4) run (40 BogoMIPS)


1) stat: run
   dyn: run
2) stat: run
   dyn: run
3) stat: run
   dyn: run
4) run (38 BogoMIPS)

Where it is not mentioned, binary failed with segfault, where is mentioned
``qemu segfaults'', QEMU segfaults directly.

My question is: is there anybody improving QEMU ARM support? Anyway, at
least sparc results looks very good, so I will probably try to test
qemu-sparc with some not so simple C++ application. Also is there anybody
here working on MIPS (mips32) support?


Karel Gardas                  address@hidden
ObjectSecurity Ltd.           http://www.objectsecurity.com

Qemu-devel mailing list

This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security 

This mail message originated outside Commerzbank via the Internet. As a result, 
the sender's address is not verifiable.

This communication is confidential and is intended only for the person to whom 
it is addressed.  If you are not that person you are not permitted to make use 
of the information and you are requested to notify Commerzbank 
Aktiengesellschaft, New York Branch immediately that you have received it and 
then to destroy the copy in your possession.  Views expressed in this e-mail do 
not necessarily reflect the views of Commerzbank AG.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]