[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?
From: |
Paul Brook |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ? |
Date: |
Sat, 18 Dec 2004 18:32:24 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.7.1 |
> > I hope you will not forget us poor mac users. Optimizing x86 on ppc
> > performance would make a number of people very happy, I'd say.
>
> performance on ppc can become very good because
> there are much more registers available for emulating
> the x86 stuff ...
The really slow bit tends to be MMU emulation, and more host registers doesn't
help here. Mapping all guest registers directly onto host registers probably
doesn't make all that much difference as the values will tend to be in L1
cache anyway.
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Adrian Smarzewski, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Fabrice Bellard, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Laurent Amon, 2004/12/16
- optimizations, was Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Johannes Schindelin, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Herbert Poetzl, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?,
Paul Brook <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, John R. Hogerhuis, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, André Braga, 2004/12/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Herbert Poetzl, 2004/12/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Adrian Smarzewski, 2004/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Herbert Poetzl, 2004/12/18
Re: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Ryan Underwood, 2004/12/16
RE: [Qemu-devel] SMB for DOS ?, Andreas Bollhalder, 2004/12/17