[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Xenoppix (KNOPPIX5.1.1 + Xen3.0.4 + QEMU/KVM + HTTP-FUS
From: |
Jens Axboe |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Xenoppix (KNOPPIX5.1.1 + Xen3.0.4 + QEMU/KVM + HTTP-FUSE) is released |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Feb 2007 18:32:04 +0100 |
On Fri, Feb 09 2007, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> Kuniyasu Suzaki wrote:
> > [...]
> > >>2) For best performances with kqemu, it is better to use Linux 2.4 as
> > >>guest OS (I know this is far from acceptable, but it can help some
> > >>people to get better performance !).
> >
> >Please tell me the reason why Linux 2.4 shows better performance, if
> >you have time. Does the difference of clock tick cause the problem?
>
> The Linux 2.6 kernel has more code running with the interrupts disabled
> than the 2.4 one. kqemu interprets the x86 code when the interrupts are
> disabled, so it is very slow in this case.
>
> A potential solution I am investigating is to use the new
> paravirtualization API of the kernel versions >= 2.6.20.
That'd be a great idea!
--
Jens Axboe