[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license
From: |
Thiemo Seufer |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Jan 2008 22:09:49 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) |
Ricardo Almeida wrote:
> > The problem is: you would have to ask every contributor whose code is
> > still somewhere in the source code. That is tedious, and takes time (I do
> > not even think that an email would suffice).
>
> >From what I read once in a slashdot post (it's worth what is worth),
> it suffices a public announcement of the change and a deadline
> (something around 60 to 90 days). The announce could be in QEmu
> homepage and on this list...
Slashdot isn't a reputable source for legal research. At least under
european law the explicit consent of each contributor is required.
Thiemo
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Bill C. Riemers, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Johannes Schindelin, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, andrzej zaborowski, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, M. Warner Losh, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license, Thiemo Seufer, 2008/01/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] s390-dis.c license,
Thiemo Seufer <=