[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please
From: |
Ronan Keryell |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:58:27 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:18:53 +0000 (GMT), Johannes Schindelin
>>>>> <address@hidden> said:
Johannes> The miniops right now are implemented as plain C commands.
Johannes> If the "good" gcc guys would not have insisted on not having
Johannes> an option to force the "ret" or "jmp" statement at the end
Johannes> of the function, we could use them for _all_ processors.
Well, what about adding a new backend phase to gcc generating what we
expect for our purpose? Ok, it is rather easy to have a branch in gcc,
harder to have it accepted in the main-stream gcc... :-) With a good
argumentation...
--
Ronan KERYELL |\/ Tel: (+33|0) 2.29.00.14.15
Département Informatique |/) Fax: (+33|0) 2.29.00.12.82
TÉLÉCOM Bretagne, CS 83818 K GSM: (+33|0) 6.13.14.37.66
F-29238 PLOUZANÉ CEDEX 3 |\ E-mail: address@hidden
FRANCE | \ http://enstb.org/~keryell
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Philip Boulain, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Andreas Färber, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Johannes Schindelin, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Mulyadi Santosa, 2008/01/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Alexander Graf, 2008/01/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Johannes Schindelin, 2008/01/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Mulyadi Santosa, 2008/01/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Andreas Färber, 2008/01/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Johannes Schindelin, 2008/01/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Julian Seward, 2008/01/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please,
Ronan Keryell <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] WE NEED GCC 4 please, Paul Brook, 2008/01/21