[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals.
From: |
Gerd Hoffmann |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals. |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Aug 2008 20:29:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) |
Ian Jackson wrote:
> Gerd Hoffmann writes ("Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals."):
>> Ian Jackson wrote:
>>> SIGQUIT should not be in this list. QUIT does not mean `please
>>> terminate'. It's a signal used for debugging purposes and usually
>>> means `please pretend this program took a SEGV'. The default action
>>> is to die and dump core, and this should be preserved.
>> Ok, we could take the SIGSEGV cleanup route, then call abort(). That
>> should come close enougth. Does that sound ok?
>
> No, because the program should not attempt to catch SEGV either.
Why not? Can you change your attitude to say "no" without giving
reasons please?
cheers,
Gerd
--
http://kraxel.fedorapeople.org/xenner/
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Ian Jackson, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Ian Jackson, 2008/08/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Stefano Stabellini, 2008/08/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals.,
Gerd Hoffmann <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., M. Warner Losh, 2008/08/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Gerd Hoffmann, 2008/08/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Anthony Liguori, 2008/08/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Daniel P. Berrange, 2008/08/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Handle terminating signals., Ian Jackson, 2008/08/13