|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/3] Move aio implementation out of raw block driver |
Date: | Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:40:45 -0500 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) |
Ryan Harper wrote:
* Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> [2008-09-22 21:52]:Ryan Harper wrote:This was taken from block-raw-posix.c, DEBUG_BLOCK. I'll change up theDEBUG_BLOCK_AIO, should I also submit a patch to rework DEBUG_BLOCK?
Yes, please.
I think the AIODriver interface should just take an fd, a completion function, and an opaque pointer. It should have to have knowledge of BDRVRawState or BlockDriverState.+typedef struct AIODriver +{ + const char *name; + RawAIOCB *(*submit)(BlockDriverState *bs, int fd, + int64_t sector_num, uint8_t *buf, + int sectors, int write, + BlockDriverCompletionFunc *cb, + void *opaque); + void (*cancel)(BlockDriverAIOCB *aiocb); + int (*flush)(void *opaque); +} AIODriver;I assume you mean shouldn't have to have. Looking at things like pa_read() in aio-posix.c , I'm not sure I see how I avoid that knowledge.
I think the key is to change the way AIOCBs are allocated.
So what happens if !defined(CONFIG_AIO)? By my reading of the code, aio_drv will be NULL and this will SEGV.*raw_aio_read(BlockDriverState *bs, } #endif - acb = raw_aio_setup(bs, sector_num, buf, nb_sectors, cb, opaque); - if (!acb) + if (fd_open(bs) < 0) return NULL; - if (aio_read(&acb->aiocb) < 0) { - qemu_aio_release(acb); + + /* submit read */+ acb = s->aio_dvr->submit(bs, s->fd, sector_num, buf, nb_sectors, 0, cb,+ opaque); + if (!acb) return NULL; - } return &acb->common; }raw_aio_read/write/cancel aren't included in the bdrv structure unless CONFIG_AIO is defined. Rather in bdrv_register, the aio emulation functions are used instead.
So these will give warnings then of unused statics? Because they are no longer conditional on CONFIG_AIO?
Regards, Anthony Liguori
+ /* init aio driver for this block device */ + s->aio_dvr = posix_aio_init();Doesn't this need to be conditional on CONFIG_AIO?Yep, in both raw_open and hdev_open().Thanks for the review.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |