[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?)
From: |
François Revol |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?) |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:27:32 +0100 CET |
> > The attached patch makes OpenHackware happy again.
> > At least qemu-system-ppc can now start debian iso, and mine as well
> [...]
> > OpenHackware should be fixed instead, but it seems the binary in
> > svn
> > has been updated after the last sources I found
> [...]
> > Seems the last update was already about ATAPI...
> > Anyone has the latest source used ?
> > I could at least fix it to check for bits on errors...
>
> Rene Rebe recently posted some diff against qemu's OHW diff, but it
> appeared to be whitespace-damaged.
Ohhh, I didn't even notice ohw.diff in pc-bios/ despite looking for
one!
I'll try to dig that one on gmane.org.
I just hope it's easier to build than OpenBIOS...
> > Of course it'd be much better to switch to a real OF instead...
> > but I don't have the time for that, couldn't find usable OpenBIOS
> > images,
>
> I once tried to get OpenBIOS working but failed, Laurent appeared to
> get some further - any update on that?
I tried building it for PPC yesterday, but I only had an powerpc-apple-
haiku- gcc around, and it didn't like it... Even after pointing it to
find our stdint.h and endian.h (WTF does it need OS headers to build a
BIOS ???).
It seems to be doing nasty things with m4 macros on C headers, really
ugly.
> > and it see[m]s CoreBoot v2 and v3 don't support ppc yet.
>
> I believe CoreBoot is unrelated to ppc, it replaces the x86 BIOS. It
> does allow to use OpenBIOS (Open Firmware) as payload but not the
> other direction - Blue Swirl used some assembler wizardry to
> bootstrap
> the sparc OpenBIOS.
CoreBoot actually supports more arch than just x86:
http://www.coreboot.org/Supported_Chipsets_and_Devices
But only v1 seemed to have ppc support.
François.
- [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc broken ?, François Revol, 2008/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc broken ?, Aurelien Jarno, 2008/11/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-ppc broken ?, François Revol, 2008/11/07
- [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), François Revol, 2008/11/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), François Revol, 2008/11/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), François Revol, 2008/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), François Revol, 2008/11/09
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Andreas Färber, 2008/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?),
François Revol <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Andreas Färber, 2008/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), François Revol, 2008/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Blue Swirl, 2008/11/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Andreas Färber, 2008/11/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Blue Swirl, 2008/11/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Laurent Vivier, 2008/11/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Blue Swirl, 2008/11/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Laurent Vivier, 2008/11/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), Blue Swirl, 2008/11/23
- Re: [Qemu-devel] atapi on ppc issue (was Re: qemu-system-ppc broken ?), René Rebe, 2008/11/24