[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2
|
From: |
Paul Brook |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:44:32 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.29-2-amd64; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; ) |
> > I expect that running qemu as root counts as a 'bad idea' (I gather
> > that commands are filtered when running as a regular user), but even so,
> > I wonder if guests should be prevented from performing firmware updates?
>
> Yeps.
I disagree. Upgrading the firmware from within the guest sounds like a
legitimate use, especially given the proliferation of proprietary windows-
only upgrade utilities.
Paul
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Bique Alexandre, 2009/07/01
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Stuart Brady, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Alexandre Bique, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2,
Paul Brook <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Alexandre Bique, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Anthony Liguori, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Stuart Brady, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Ian Jackson, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Avi Kivity, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Anthony Liguori, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Avi Kivity, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Anthony Liguori, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] ATAPI pass through v2, Vincent Hanquez, 2009/07/08