Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] PPC: Add wrapper for target long DCR operations

[Aurelien Jarno]

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:19:31PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> 
> On 14.01.2010, at 16:13, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 01, 2010 at 04:41:06PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >> The recent transition to always have the DCR helper functions take 32 bit
> >> values broke the PPC64 target, as tlong became 64 bits there.
> >> 
> >> This patch moves all translate.c callers to a _tl function that simply
> >> calls the uint32_t functions. That way we don't need to mess with TCG
> >> trying to pass registers as uint32_t variables to functions.
> >> 
> >> Fixes PPC64 build with --enable-debug-tcg
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <address@hidden>
> >> Reported-by: Stefan Weil <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> target-ppc/cpu.h       |    2 ++
> >> target-ppc/helper.h    |    4 ++--
> >> target-ppc/op_helper.c |   10 ++++++++++
> >> target-ppc/translate.c |   12 ++++++------
> >> 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/target-ppc/cpu.h b/target-ppc/cpu.h
> >> index d15bba1..60a8b68 100644
> >> --- a/target-ppc/cpu.h
> >> +++ b/target-ppc/cpu.h
> >> @@ -733,6 +733,8 @@ void ppc_store_slb (CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong rb, 
> >> target_ulong rs);
> >> void ppc_store_sr (CPUPPCState *env, int srnum, target_ulong value);
> >> #endif /* !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY) */
> >> void ppc_store_msr (CPUPPCState *env, target_ulong value);
> >> +void helper_store_dcr (uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t val);
> >> +uint32_t helper_load_dcr (uint32_t dcrn);
> >> 
> >> void ppc_cpu_list (FILE *f, int (*cpu_fprintf)(FILE *f, const char *fmt, 
> >> ...));
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/target-ppc/helper.h b/target-ppc/helper.h
> >> index 40d4ced..86f0af7 100644
> >> --- a/target-ppc/helper.h
> >> +++ b/target-ppc/helper.h
> >> @@ -359,8 +359,8 @@ DEF_HELPER_2(divo, tl, tl, tl)
> >> DEF_HELPER_2(divs, tl, tl, tl)
> >> DEF_HELPER_2(divso, tl, tl, tl)
> >> 
> >> -DEF_HELPER_1(load_dcr, i32, i32);
> >> -DEF_HELPER_2(store_dcr, void, i32, i32)
> >> +DEF_HELPER_1(load_dcr_tl, tl, tl);
> >> +DEF_HELPER_2(store_dcr_tl, void, tl, tl)
> >> 
> >> DEF_HELPER_1(load_dump_spr, void, i32)
> >> DEF_HELPER_1(store_dump_spr, void, i32)
> >> diff --git a/target-ppc/op_helper.c b/target-ppc/op_helper.c
> >> index cea27f2..6c375d3 100644
> >> --- a/target-ppc/op_helper.c
> >> +++ b/target-ppc/op_helper.c
> >> @@ -1844,6 +1844,11 @@ uint32_t helper_load_dcr (uint32_t dcrn)
> >>     return val;
> >> }
> >> 
> >> +target_ulong helper_load_dcr_tl (target_ulong dcrn)
> >> +{
> >> +    return (uint32_t)helper_load_dcr((uint32_t)dcrn);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> void helper_store_dcr (uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t val)
> >> {
> >>     if (unlikely(env->dcr_env == NULL)) {
> >> @@ -1857,6 +1862,11 @@ void helper_store_dcr (uint32_t dcrn, uint32_t val)
> >>     }
> >> }
> >> 
> >> +void helper_store_dcr_tl (target_ulong dcrn, target_ulong val)
> >> +{
> >> +    helper_store_dcr((uint32_t)dcrn, (uint32_t)val);
> >> +}
> >> +
> > 
> > I do wonder why we need to keep the old helper_load_dcr() and
> > helper_store_dcr() instead of modifying them directly. They doesn't seems
> > to be used elsewhere.
> 
> Last time I checked they were used in hw/*ppc*.c. Maybe mangled through funny 
> preprocessor or function callback logic. But maybe I'm wrong :).
> 

I am not able to find them. I have tried to remove helper_load_dcr() and
helper_store_dcr() from target-ppc/cpu.h and the code still compiles.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
address@hidden                 http://www.aurel32.net