[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 26

[Anthony Liguori]

On 01/26/2010 07:24 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 03:18 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > The main question is where does it belong?
> >
> > a) built into qemu
> > b) built as separate tool, but shipped with qemu
> > c) completely separate
> >
> > I'm personally leaning towards a. That way we can reuse the detection 
> > code and give help when an option is used that doesn't work.
>
> Me too, especially as the whole stack is involved, and qemu is the 
> topmost part from our perspective (no doubt libvirt will want to 
> integrate that functionality as well).

I'm not sure I agree.  It would use no code from qemu and really benefit 
in no way from being part of qemu.  I don't feel that strongly about it 
though.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori