[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patch] Support translating Guest physical address to H

From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Patch] Support translating Guest physical address to Host virtual address.
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 16:09:06 -0600
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20091209 Fedora/3.0-4.fc12 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0

On 02/07/2010 10:31 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
Only insofar as you don't have to deal with getting at the VM fd. You can avoid the problem by having the kvm ioctl interface take a pid or something.

That's a racy interface.

The mechanism itself is racy. That said, pid's don't recycle very quickly so the chances of running into a practical issue is quite small.

Well, we need to provide a reasonable alternative.

I think this is the sort of thing that really needs to be a utility that lives outside of qemu. I'm absolutely in favor of exposing enough internals to let people do interesting things provided it's reasonably correct.

One might be to use -mempath (which is hacky by itself, but so far we have no alternative) and use an external tool on the memory object to poison it. An advantage is that you can use it independently of kvm.

It would help if the actual requirements were spelled out a bit more. What exactly needs validating? Do we need to validate that a poisoning a host physical address results in a very particular guest page getting poisoned?

Is it not enough to just choose a random anonymous memory area within the qemu process, generate an MCE to that location, see whether qemu SIGBUS's. If it doesn't, validate that an MCE has been received in the guest?

But FWIW, I think a set of per-VM directories in sysfs could be very useful for this sort of debugging.

Maybe we should consider having the equivalent of a QMP-for-debugging session. This would be a special QMP session that we basically provided no compatibility or even sanity guarantees that was specifically there for debugging. I would expect that it be disabled in any production build (even perhaps even by default in the general build).


Anthony Liguori

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]