[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: How fun it must be to commit patches without posting th

From: malc
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: How fun it must be to commit patches without posting them!
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:09:58 +0300 (MSK)
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)

On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

> malc,
> commit bc5b600 does the same thing as the series I posted at
> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/62997, only worse:
> 1) for vl.c and qemu-img.c, it disable FORTIFY_SOURCE checking which is only
> enabled by the printf macro:
> #  define printf(...) \
>   __builtin___printf_chk (__USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __VA_ARGS__)
> 2) for readline.c, it includes a useless complication, namely
> #ifdef printf
> #undef printf
> #endif
> 3) for vl.c, it doesn't take the occasion to cleanup qemu-options.hx's useless
> usage of % sequences that are filled in by vl.c.
> Please revert it and commit my series instead, or explain why you didn't care
> about reading the entire thread or about explicitly NACKing my patches.

Because i had a hard disk crash and hence ended up with a new shiny
system where QEMU does not build anymore, also not enough patience
to revisit the thread and figure out why it wasn't applied yet.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]