[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 9

From: Avi Kivity
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 9
Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:32:22 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20100120 Fedora/3.0.1-1.fc12 Thunderbird/3.0.1

On 02/09/2010 05:08 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
I'm not saying we should push hpet into the kernel to save userspace coding effort; there should be an independent reason to do this. But I don't think threading qemu is going to be anything near easy.

It's certainly not easy but I don't think it's impossibly hard.

Not impossible - see for example the kernel, the BKL should be removed RSN.

But yes, I think RCU will simplify things for us, and we have all of that experience to learn from.

error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]