[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 12/48] error: New error_printf() and error_v
From: |
Luiz Capitulino |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RFC 12/48] error: New error_printf() and error_vprintf() |
Date: |
Mon, 1 Mar 2010 13:09:41 -0300 |
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 09:54:32 +0100
Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> Luiz Capitulino <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 18:55:24 +0100
> > Markus Armbruster <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> FIXME They should return int, so callers can calculate width.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
> >> ---
> >> qemu-error.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> >> qemu-error.h | 14 ++++++++++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/qemu-error.c b/qemu-error.c
> >> index 63bcdcf..76c660a 100644
> >> --- a/qemu-error.c
> >> +++ b/qemu-error.c
> >> @@ -1,18 +1,53 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * Error reporting
> >> + *
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2010 Red Hat Inc.
> >> + *
> >> + * Authors:
> >> + * Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>,
> >> + *
> >> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or
> >> later.
> >> + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> #include <stdio.h>
> >> #include "monitor.h"
> >> #include "sysemu.h"
> >>
> >> -void qemu_error(const char *fmt, ...)
> >> +/*
> >> + * Print to current monitor if we have one, else to stderr.
> >> + * FIXME should return int, so callers can calculate width, but that
> >> + * requires surgery to monitor_printf(). Left for another day.
> >> + */
> >> +void error_vprintf(const char *fmt, va_list ap)
> >> {
> >> - va_list args;
> >> -
> >> - va_start(args, fmt);
> >> if (cur_mon) {
> >> - monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, args);
> >> + monitor_vprintf(cur_mon, fmt, ap);
> >> } else {
> >> - vfprintf(stderr, fmt, args);
> >> + vfprintf(stderr, fmt, ap);
> >> }
> >> - va_end(args);
> >> +}
> >
> > This can be static.
>
> Yes. But why would that be useful? It's neither a name space pollution
> nor does it poke a hole into an abstraction.
Well, IMHO unused public symbols serve only one purpose: to pollute the
global namespace :)
So, I think the question is: if it doesn't have any user and if you
don't expect it to be used anytime soon: why make it public?
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * Print to current monitor if we have one, else to stderr.
> >> + * FIXME just like error_vprintf()
> >> + */
> >> +void error_printf(const char *fmt, ...)
> >> +{
> >> + va_list ap;
> >> +
> >> + va_start(ap, fmt);
> >> + error_vprintf(fmt, ap);
> >> + va_end(ap);
> >> +}
> >
> > This function's name is inconsistent with qemu_error() and
> > qemu_error_new().
>
> I'm fond of prepending qemu_ to random symbols left and right. Yes, I
> know I'm reading QEMU source code, thank you :)
>
> If the names here are really important: What about stripping qemu_ from
> qemu_error() & friends?
I'm ok with that (and Paolo gave some suggestions), but I hope you
submit a patch soon. It's ok to criticize/improve bad consistency policies,
but it's not ok to break them.