[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c
From: |
Blue Swirl |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c |
Date: |
Sun, 23 May 2010 16:02:06 +0000 |
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Jan Kiszka <address@hidden> wrote:
> Blue Swirl wrote:
>> Move hpet_in_legacy_mode check from mc146818.c to pc.c. Remove
>> the optimization where the periodic timer is disabled if
>> hpet is in legacy mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Blue Swirl <address@hidden>
>> ---
>> hw/mc146818rtc.c | 37 +++++++------------------------------
>> hw/mc146818rtc.h | 2 ++
>> hw/pc.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/mc146818rtc.c b/hw/mc146818rtc.c
>> index 571c593..e0c33c5 100644
>> --- a/hw/mc146818rtc.c
>> +++ b/hw/mc146818rtc.c
>> @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@
>> #include "pc.h"
>> #include "apic.h"
>> #include "isa.h"
>> -#include "hpet_emul.h"
>> #include "mc146818rtc.h"
>>
>> //#define DEBUG_CMOS
>> @@ -94,19 +93,6 @@ typedef struct RTCState {
>> QEMUTimer *second_timer2;
>> } RTCState;
>>
>> -static void rtc_irq_raise(qemu_irq irq)
>> -{
>> - /* When HPET is operating in legacy mode, RTC interrupts are disabled
>> - * We block qemu_irq_raise, but not qemu_irq_lower, in case legacy
>> - * mode is established while interrupt is raised. We want it to
>> - * be lowered in any case
>> - */
>> -#if defined TARGET_I386
>> - if (!hpet_in_legacy_mode())
>> -#endif
>> - qemu_irq_raise(irq);
>> -}
>> -
>> static void rtc_set_time(RTCState *s);
>> static void rtc_copy_date(RTCState *s);
>>
>> @@ -131,7 +117,7 @@ static void rtc_coalesced_timer(void *opaque)
>> if (s->irq_coalesced != 0) {
>> apic_reset_irq_delivered();
>> s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_C] |= 0xc0;
>> - rtc_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> + qemu_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> if (apic_get_irq_delivered()) {
>> s->irq_coalesced--;
>> }
>> @@ -145,19 +131,10 @@ static void rtc_timer_update(RTCState *s,
>> int64_t current_time)
>> {
>> int period_code, period;
>> int64_t cur_clock, next_irq_clock;
>> - int enable_pie;
>>
>> period_code = s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_A] & 0x0f;
>> -#if defined TARGET_I386
>> - /* disable periodic timer if hpet is in legacy mode, since interrupts
>> are
>> - * disabled anyway.
>> - */
>
> Does some dumb OS we care about (specifically in KVM mode) first enable
> the periodic RTC, then discovers the HPET, switches over, forgetting
> about the RTC? Otherwise: the guest will get what it deserves (degraded
> performance).
No idea. The performance penalty also depends on the trigger frequency.
>> - enable_pie = !hpet_in_legacy_mode();
>> -#else
>> - enable_pie = 1;
>> -#endif
>> if (period_code != 0
>> - && (((s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_B] & REG_B_PIE) && enable_pie)
>> + && ((s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_B] & REG_B_PIE)
>> || ((s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_B] & REG_B_SQWE) && s->sqw_irq))) {
>> if (period_code <= 2)
>> period_code += 7;
>> @@ -194,14 +171,14 @@ static void rtc_periodic_timer(void *opaque)
>> if (s->irq_reinject_on_ack_count >= RTC_REINJECT_ON_ACK_COUNT)
>> s->irq_reinject_on_ack_count = 0;
>> apic_reset_irq_delivered();
>> - rtc_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> + qemu_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> if (!apic_get_irq_delivered()) {
>> s->irq_coalesced++;
>> rtc_coalesced_timer_update(s);
>> }
>> } else
>> #endif
>> - rtc_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> + qemu_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> }
>> if (s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_B] & REG_B_SQWE) {
>> /* Not square wave at all but we don't want 2048Hz interrupts!
>> @@ -430,7 +407,7 @@ static void rtc_update_second2(void *opaque)
>> s->cmos_data[RTC_HOURS_ALARM] == s->current_tm.tm_hour)) {
>>
>> s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_C] |= 0xa0;
>> - rtc_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> + qemu_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -438,7 +415,7 @@ static void rtc_update_second2(void *opaque)
>> s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_C] |= REG_C_UF;
>> if (s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_B] & REG_B_UIE) {
>> s->cmos_data[RTC_REG_C] |= REG_C_IRQF;
>> - rtc_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> + qemu_irq_raise(s->irq);
>> }
>>
>> /* clear update in progress bit */
>> @@ -588,7 +565,7 @@ static int rtc_initfn(ISADevice *dev)
>> {
>> RTCState *s = DO_UPCAST(RTCState, dev, dev);
>> int base = 0x70;
>> - int isairq = 8;
>> + int isairq = RTC_ISA_IRQ;
>>
>> isa_init_irq(dev, &s->irq, isairq);
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/mc146818rtc.h b/hw/mc146818rtc.h
>> index 6f46a68..d630485 100644
>> --- a/hw/mc146818rtc.h
>> +++ b/hw/mc146818rtc.h
>> @@ -7,4 +7,6 @@ ISADevice *rtc_init(int base_year);
>> void rtc_set_memory(ISADevice *dev, int addr, int val);
>> void rtc_set_date(ISADevice *dev, const struct tm *tm);
>>
>> +#define RTC_ISA_IRQ 8
>> +
>> #endif /* !MC146818RTC_H */
>> diff --git a/hw/pc.c b/hw/pc.c
>> index e7f31d3..5a703e1 100644
>> --- a/hw/pc.c
>> +++ b/hw/pc.c
>> @@ -66,16 +66,38 @@ struct e820_table {
>>
>> static struct e820_table e820_table;
>>
>> -void isa_irq_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
>> +static void isa_set_irq(IsaIrqState *isa, int n, int level)
>> {
>> - IsaIrqState *isa = (IsaIrqState *)opaque;
>> -
>> if (n < 16) {
>> qemu_set_irq(isa->i8259[n], level);
>> }
>> - if (isa->ioapic)
>> + if (isa->ioapic) {
>> qemu_set_irq(isa->ioapic[n], level);
>> -};
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void rtc_irq_handler(IsaIrqState *isa, int level)
>> +{
>> + /* When HPET is operating in legacy mode, RTC interrupts are disabled.
>> + * We block qemu_irq_raise, but not qemu_irq_lower, in case legacy
>> + * mode is established while interrupt is raised. We want it to
>> + * be lowered in any case.
>> + */
>> + if (!hpet_in_legacy_mode() || !level) {
>> + isa_set_irq(isa, RTC_ISA_IRQ, level);
>> + }
>> +}
>
> If you clear the RTC IRQ unconditionally, I could imagine that the
> enable_pie removal is more than a de-optimization. At least in some
> corner cases. But this clearing looks suspicious anyway. Instead, when
> switching, the new IRQ line owner should set the level - once.
This was how the original version worked, the check with
hpet_in_legacy_mode() was only used for qemu_irq_raise(), not
qemu_irq_lower(). The new handler will be called for both cases, so
the check must consider also the level.
>> +
>> +void isa_irq_handler(void *opaque, int n, int level)
>> +{
>> + IsaIrqState *isa = (IsaIrqState *)opaque;
>> +
>> + if (n == RTC_ISA_IRQ) {
>> + rtc_irq_handler(isa, level);
>> + } else {
>> + isa_set_irq(isa, n, level);
>> + }
>> +}
>>
>> static void ioport80_write(void *opaque, uint32_t addr, uint32_t data)
>> {
>
> Jan
>
>
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Blue Swirl, 2010/05/23
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Jan Kiszka, 2010/05/23
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c,
Blue Swirl <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Jan Kiszka, 2010/05/24
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Blue Swirl, 2010/05/24
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Jan Kiszka, 2010/05/24
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Gleb Natapov, 2010/05/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Jan Kiszka, 2010/05/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Gleb Natapov, 2010/05/25
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH, RFC 1/4] mc146818: move hpet handling to pc.c, Gleb Natapov, 2010/05/25