[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold r
From: |
Gleb Natapov |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset. |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:15:16 +0300 |
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 08:05:07AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 06:19 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >Why stop there. Why not implement proper power planes support. Some
> >devices are not powered down on S3/S4 suspend for instance.
>
> What feature would it give us? The mapping of D-state to S-state is
> defined by the ACPI tables, no? So we're in total control of
> whether we would ever do this and I can't see the advantage of doing
> it.
>
ACPI only describes how actual HW behaves. I don't understand why do you
bring ACPI here. RTC can be setup to wake up guest. Currently we reset
RTC on S3.
--
Gleb.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., Gleb Natapov, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., Avi Kivity, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., Anthony Liguori, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., Avi Kivity, 2010/08/31
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., Gleb Natapov, 2010/08/31
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., Avi Kivity, 2010/08/30
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/5] RFC: distinguish warm reset from cold reset., Glauber Costa, 2010/08/30