On 09/12/2010 12:06 PM, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> For the Phenom type, I honestly don't remember why, but there was also a good reason to add it. In fact, I use it today to have nested virt without -cpu host on hardware that's too new for my guests. >> Curious, what guests balk at modern hardware but are fine with phenom? > Sles11 GA ;).
Still curious, how does -cpu host break it?
>>> Either way, I don't think we need a phenom2 type. The features additional are minor enough to not really matter and all use cases I can come up with require either -cpu host (local virt) or -cpu phenom (migration). >> I'm fine with this (or with adding phenom2). But don't make phenom contain flags that real phenoms don't have. > Those were my words :).
Then we are in agreement.
-- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to address@hidden More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html