qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] boot order specification


From: Blue Swirl
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/5] boot order specification
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 15:35:38 +0000

On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Gleb Natapov <address@hidden> wrote:
> This is current sate of the patch series for people to comment on.
> I dropped ioport double reservation checking from isa-bus and added
> bus_id field for IDE bus since as Markus pointed out unit has different
> meaning there.
>
> This patch series produce names like:
>
> address@hidden,03f7/address@hidden
> address@hidden,03f7/address@hidden
> address@hidden:00:01.1/address@hidden:0
> address@hidden:00:01.1/address@hidden:1
> address@hidden:00:03.0/address@hidden
> address@hidden:00:04.0/address@hidden
>
> They will be passed to BIOS to determine boot order.

We also use OpenBIOS for PPC and Sparcs. A compatible boot device for
those would be OpenFirmware tree name. I think your names should then
become:
/pci/isa/address@hidden/address@hidden
/pci/isa/address@hidden/address@hidden
/pci/address@hidden/1,0
/pci/address@hidden/1,1
/pci/address@hidden
/pci/address@hidden

The PCI addressing scheme in OF was a bit twisty, I just invented
integers in place of those.

Anyway, I don't think we should invent yet another device path naming system.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]