[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn
From: |
Nathan Froyd |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn |
Date: |
Sat, 6 Nov 2010 14:59:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 07:24:39PM +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:
> malc <address@hidden> writes:
>
> ZF is undefined according to AMD's 24594.pdf page 69.
>
> Ah, you're right. It seems that all existing x86 implementations leave
> ZF alone, though. (I am not arguing that qeum is broken, the bug is in
> my code.)
FWIW, the Intel manuals (253666, June 2010) state that the ZF flag is
unaffected, not just undefined.
-Nathan
- [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, Torbjorn Granlund, 2010/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, malc, 2010/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, Torbjorn Granlund, 2010/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, malc, 2010/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn,
Nathan Froyd <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, malc, 2010/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, malc, 2010/11/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, Torbjorn Granlund, 2010/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, malc, 2010/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, Torbjorn Granlund, 2010/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, malc, 2010/11/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn, malc, 2010/11/10