Re: [Qemu-devel] Bug report about x86 'bt' insn

[malc]

On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Torbjorn Granlund wrote:

> malc <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>   All is the keyword here, i doubt that exhaustive search was performed
>   furthermore, AMDs documentation (to the best of my knowledge still)
>   still maintains that ZF is undefined.
> 
> AMD indeed still says undefined in their documentation (as of two hours
> ago).  I have asked AMD for a clarification, mainly to make sure they
> are aware of Intel's documentation change.
> 
> (I am not certain about what you doubt.  As I said, I did not check all
> 2^64 operand values combined all possible bt bit position arguments.  I
> believe I have checked all 64-bit x86 processors implementations [two
> generations of Core2, NHM and WSM based Core ix, Via Nano, as well as all
> Athlon64/Opteron generations).)

I meant all CPU variants.

-- 
mailto:address@hidden