[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification |
Date: |
Sun, 28 Nov 2010 19:02:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 01:22:42PM +0000, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Gleb Natapov <address@hidden> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 03:13:52PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 09:54:04AM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:56:10PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> > > On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> >> > > >On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >> > > >>Anthony, Blue
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be
> >> > > >>applied?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to
> >> > > >review it?
> >> > > >
> >> > > >IOW, last call if you have objections :-)
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > > I haven't reviewed this - I trust the author and maintainers to get
> >> > > it right.
> >> > >
> >> > > But I notice the there is no documentation - surely some is needed?
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> > The patch creates Openfirmware device path from qdev
> >> > hierarchy. Each element of a device path depends on type of a bus
> >> > the device resides on. You can find various bus bindings here:
> >> > http://playground.sun.com/1275/bindings/ and main spec is here
> >>
> >> sun.com links have a tendency to disappear nowdays :)
> >> Is this the official location? Aren't bindings part of some standard?
> > I think this is official location.
>
> I'd suppose some of them are IEEE standards, available for a fee.
I don't think so:
The IEEE-1275 Open Firmware standard was not reaffirmed by the OFWG and
has been officially withdrawn by IEEE. Unfortunately, this means it is
unavailable from the IEEE.
--
MST
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Blue Swirl, 2010/11/23
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Avi Kivity, 2010/11/27
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Gleb Natapov, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Avi Kivity, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Gleb Natapov, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Blue Swirl, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Gleb Natapov, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Gleb Natapov, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Blue Swirl, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Gleb Natapov, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Gleb Natapov, 2010/11/28
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Gleb Natapov, 2010/11/28
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification, Kevin O'Connor, 2010/11/23