[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?
From: |
Michael Tokarev |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jan 2011 13:00:54 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101227 Icedove/3.0.11 |
28.01.2011 11:06, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote:
[]
> I would like Kemari to be included for 0.14. Thanks to many
> valuable comments from various reviewers, it got better than
> ever, I believe. For those who may object, it wouldn't affect
> any functions including live migration unless one turns it on.
> Besides, it is a good application of live migration. By having
> merged, I would be able to focus on increasing functionality and
> optimization.
It's somewhat unexpected to see merge request for any new
functionality into a "stable" branch. Having nothing bad
against Kemari, I still think we shouldn't include any new
functionality into 0.14, which were planned to be released
before new year... ;)
I mean, if it were not merged so far, for reasons that can
be discussed separately etc, regardless of its good shape
and so on... let's don't do any last-minute merges.
Mergeing it to a development branch is entirely another
question.
/mjt
- [Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] fix crash when a read handler calls qemu_set_fd_handler2(), (continued)
[Qemu-devel] [PING 0.14] seabios virtio bug, Rick Vernam, 2011/01/27
Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?, Gleb Natapov, 2011/01/28
[Qemu-devel] Re: [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2011/01/27
Re: [Qemu-devel] [0.14] Queue of 0.14 patches/pull?, Amit Shah, 2011/01/28