[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs su

From: Jes Sorensen
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU: Discussion of separating core functionality vs supportive features
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 11:21:25 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv: Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.7

On 03/01/11 13:07, Dor Laor wrote:
> On 02/28/2011 07:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> I'm very nervous about having a large number of daemons necessary to run
>> QEMU.  I think a reasonable approach would be a single front-end daemond.
> s/daemon/son processes/
> Qemu is the one that should spawn them and they should be transparent
> from the management. This way running qemu stays the same and qemu just
> need to add the logic to get a SIGCHILD and potentially re-execute an
> dead son process.

I disagree here, I do not want to require QEMU to spawn the new
processes. Having a daemon you can use to connect will provide more
flexibility and isn't unreasonably complex.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]