[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl
From: |
Alon Levy |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Mar 2011 12:30:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 01:35:58PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> > > at
> > > /var/tmp/portage/app-emulation/qemu-kvm-0.14.0/work/qemu-kvm-0.14.0/qemu-kvm.c:1466
> > > #12 0x00007ffff77bb944 in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> > > #13 0x00007ffff5e491dd in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
> > > (gdb)
> >
> > That's a spice bug. In fact, there are a lot of
> > qemu_mutex_lock/unlock_iothread in that subsystem. I bet at least a few
> > of them can cause even more subtle problems.
> >
> > Two general issues with dropping the global mutex like this:
> > - The caller of mutex_unlock is responsible for maintaining
> > cpu_single_env across the unlocked phase (that's related to the
> > abort above).
> > - Dropping the lock in the middle of a callback is risky. That may
> > enable re-entrances of code sections that weren't designed for this
> > (I'm skeptic about the side effects of
> > qemu_spice_vm_change_state_handler - why dropping the lock here?).
> >
> > Spice requires a careful review regarding such issues. Or it should
> > pioneer with introducing its own lock so that we can handle at least
> > related I/O activities over the VCPUs without holding the global mutex
> > (but I bet it's not the simplest candidate for such a new scheme).
> >
> > Jan
> >
>
> Agree with the concern regarding spice.
>
What are the pros and cons of (re)introducing a spice specific lock?
+ simplicity. Only spice touches the spice lock.
- ? what were the original reasons for Gerd dropping the spice lock?
I have no problem reintroducing this lock, I'm just concerned that it's
wasted effort because after I send that patch someone will jump and remind
me why it was removed in the first place.
> Regarding global mutex, TCG and KVM execution behaviour can become more
> similar wrt locking by dropping qemu_global_mutex during generation and
> execution of TBs.
>
> Of course for memory or PIO accesses from vcpu context qemu_global_mutex
> must be acquired.
>
> With that in place, it becomes easier to justify further improvements
> regarding parallelization, such as using a read-write lock for
> l1_phys_map / phys_page_find_alloc.
>
>
> 21.62% sh 3d38920b3f [.] 0x00003d38920b3f
>
> 6.38% sh qemu-system-x86_64 [.] phys_page_find_alloc
>
> 4.90% sh qemu-system-x86_64 [.] tb_find_fast
>
> 4.34% sh qemu-system-x86_64 [.] tlb_flush
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to address@hidden
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl, Marcelo Tosatti, 2011/03/05
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/05
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl,
Alon Levy <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl, Avi Kivity, 2011/03/06
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl, Marcelo Tosatti, 2011/03/07
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/07
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl, Avi Kivity, 2011/03/08
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/08
- [Qemu-devel] Re: kvm crashes with spice while loading qxl, Avi Kivity, 2011/03/08