[Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8

[Jan Kiszka]

On 2011-03-08 18:41, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 07:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>>  On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>>   The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a
>>>>>>   regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no?
>>>>>
>>>>>  Can't follow. What do you mean?
>>>>
>>>>  I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this 
>>> test
>>>>  definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu 
>>> non-iothread.
>>>>    What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm.
>>
>> That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes?  I wasn't talking about 
>> that in the call.
> 
> Of course, this is an important issue in its own right.

For sure, and it must also go in before starting to looki at glib
mainloops etc.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux