[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0 |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Mar 2011 12:44:12 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 2011-03-09 12:20, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 03/09/2011 08:37 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> It's probably worth validating that the iothread lock is
>> always held when qemu_set_fd_handler2 is invoked to confirm this race
>> theory, adding something like
>>
>> assert(pthread_mutex_trylock(&qemu_mutex) != 0);
>> (that's for qemu-kvm only)
>
> Alternatively, iohandlers could be a(nother) good place to start
> introducing fine-grained locks or rwlocks.
Yeah, could be a good idea. It's a fairly confined area here that needs
protection.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Corentin Chary, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Corentin Chary, 2011/03/14
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/14
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/15
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/15
[Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/09
[Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/09
[Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/09
- [Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0,
Jan Kiszka <=