[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix performance regression in qemu_get_ram_ptr
From: |
Vincent Palatin |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix performance regression in qemu_get_ram_ptr |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Mar 2011 15:47:46 -0500 |
When the commit f471a17e9d869df3c6573f7ec02c4725676d6f3a converted the
ram_blocks structure to QLIST, it also removed the conditional check before
switching the current block at the beginning of the list.
In the common use case where ram_blocks has a few blocks with only one
frequently accessed (the main RAM), this has a performance impact as it
performs the useless list operations on each call (which are on a really
hot path).
On my machine emulation (ARM on amd64), this patch reduces the
percentage of CPU time spent in qemu_get_ram_ptr from 6.3% to 2.1% in the
profiling of a full boot.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Palatin <address@hidden>
---
exec.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index d611100..81f08b7 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -2957,8 +2957,11 @@ void *qemu_get_ram_ptr(ram_addr_t addr)
QLIST_FOREACH(block, &ram_list.blocks, next) {
if (addr - block->offset < block->length) {
- QLIST_REMOVE(block, next);
- QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&ram_list.blocks, block, next);
+ /* Move this entry to to start of the list. */
+ if (block != QLIST_FIRST(&ram_list.blocks)) {
+ QLIST_REMOVE(block, next);
+ QLIST_INSERT_HEAD(&ram_list.blocks, block, next);
+ }
return block->host + (addr - block->offset);
}
}
--
1.7.3.1
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix performance regression in qemu_get_ram_ptr,
Vincent Palatin <=