|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Strategic decision: COW format |
Date: | Sun, 13 Mar 2011 12:48:27 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.14) Gecko/20110223 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.8 |
On 03/12/2011 11:51 PM, Chunqiang Tang wrote:
In short, FVD's internal snapshot achieves the ideal properties of G1-G6, by 1) using the reference count table to only track "static" snapshots, 2) not keeping the reference count table in memory, 3) not updating the on-disk "static" reference count table when the VM runs, and 4) efficiently tracking dynamically allocated blocks by piggybacking on FVD's other features, i.e., its journal and small one-level lookup table.
Are you assuming snapshots are read-only?It's not clear to me how this would work with writeable snapshots. It's not clear to me that writeable snapshots are really that important, but this is an advantage of having a refcount table.
External snapshots are essentially read-only snapshots so I can understand the argument for it.
Regards, Anthony Liguori
Regards, ChunQiang (CQ) Tang Homepage: http://www.research.ibm.com/people/c/ctang
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |