[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vn
From: |
Corentin Chary |
Subject: |
[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Mar 2011 09:19:56 +0000 |
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Corentin Chary
<address@hidden> wrote:
> The threaded VNC servers messed up with QEMU fd handlers without
> any kind of locking, and that can cause some nasty race conditions.
>
> Using qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() won't work because vnc_dpy_cpy(),
> which will wait for the current job queue to finish, can be called with
> the iothread lock held.
>
> Instead, we now store the data in a temporary buffer, and use a bottom
> half to notify the main thread that new data is available.
>
> vnc_[un]lock_ouput() is still needed to access VncState members like
> abort, csock or jobs_buffer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <address@hidden>
> ---
> ui/vnc-jobs-async.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> ui/vnc-jobs.h | 1 +
> ui/vnc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> ui/vnc.h | 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/ui/vnc-jobs-async.c b/ui/vnc-jobs-async.c
> index f596247..4438776 100644
> --- a/ui/vnc-jobs-async.c
> +++ b/ui/vnc-jobs-async.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>
> #include "vnc.h"
> #include "vnc-jobs.h"
> +#include "qemu_socket.h"
>
> /*
> * Locking:
> @@ -155,6 +156,24 @@ void vnc_jobs_join(VncState *vs)
> qemu_cond_wait(&queue->cond, &queue->mutex);
> }
> vnc_unlock_queue(queue);
> + vnc_jobs_consume_buffer(vs);
> +}
> +
> +void vnc_jobs_consume_buffer(VncState *vs)
> +{
> + bool flush;
> +
> + vnc_lock_output(vs);
> + if (vs->jobs_buffer.offset) {
> + vnc_write(vs, vs->jobs_buffer.buffer, vs->jobs_buffer.offset);
> + buffer_reset(&vs->jobs_buffer);
> + }
> + flush = vs->csock != -1 && vs->abort != true;
> + vnc_unlock_output(vs);
> +
> + if (flush) {
> + vnc_flush(vs);
> + }
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -197,7 +216,6 @@ static int vnc_worker_thread_loop(VncJobQueue *queue)
> VncState vs;
> int n_rectangles;
> int saved_offset;
> - bool flush;
>
> vnc_lock_queue(queue);
> while (QTAILQ_EMPTY(&queue->jobs) && !queue->exit) {
> @@ -213,6 +231,7 @@ static int vnc_worker_thread_loop(VncJobQueue *queue)
>
> vnc_lock_output(job->vs);
> if (job->vs->csock == -1 || job->vs->abort == true) {
> + vnc_unlock_output(job->vs);
> goto disconnected;
> }
> vnc_unlock_output(job->vs);
> @@ -233,10 +252,6 @@ static int vnc_worker_thread_loop(VncJobQueue *queue)
>
> if (job->vs->csock == -1) {
> vnc_unlock_display(job->vs->vd);
> - /* output mutex must be locked before going to
> - * disconnected:
> - */
> - vnc_lock_output(job->vs);
> goto disconnected;
> }
>
> @@ -254,24 +269,19 @@ static int vnc_worker_thread_loop(VncJobQueue *queue)
> vs.output.buffer[saved_offset] = (n_rectangles >> 8) & 0xFF;
> vs.output.buffer[saved_offset + 1] = n_rectangles & 0xFF;
>
> - /* Switch back buffers */
> vnc_lock_output(job->vs);
> - if (job->vs->csock == -1) {
> - goto disconnected;
> + if (job->vs->csock != -1) {
> + buffer_reserve(&job->vs->jobs_buffer, vs.output.offset);
> + buffer_append(&job->vs->jobs_buffer, vs.output.buffer,
> + vs.output.offset);
> + /* Copy persistent encoding data */
> + vnc_async_encoding_end(job->vs, &vs);
> +
> + qemu_bh_schedule(job->vs->bh);
> }
> -
> - vnc_write(job->vs, vs.output.buffer, vs.output.offset);
> -
> -disconnected:
> - /* Copy persistent encoding data */
> - vnc_async_encoding_end(job->vs, &vs);
> - flush = (job->vs->csock != -1 && job->vs->abort != true);
> vnc_unlock_output(job->vs);
>
> - if (flush) {
> - vnc_flush(job->vs);
> - }
> -
> +disconnected:
> vnc_lock_queue(queue);
> QTAILQ_REMOVE(&queue->jobs, job, next);
> vnc_unlock_queue(queue);
> diff --git a/ui/vnc-jobs.h b/ui/vnc-jobs.h
> index b8dab81..4c661f9 100644
> --- a/ui/vnc-jobs.h
> +++ b/ui/vnc-jobs.h
> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ void vnc_jobs_join(VncState *vs);
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_VNC_THREAD
>
> +void vnc_jobs_consume_buffer(VncState *vs);
> void vnc_start_worker_thread(void);
> bool vnc_worker_thread_running(void);
> void vnc_stop_worker_thread(void);
> diff --git a/ui/vnc.c b/ui/vnc.c
> index 610f884..f28873b 100644
> --- a/ui/vnc.c
> +++ b/ui/vnc.c
> @@ -1011,7 +1011,10 @@ static void vnc_disconnect_finish(VncState *vs)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_VNC_THREAD
> qemu_mutex_destroy(&vs->output_mutex);
> + qemu_bh_delete(vs->bh);
> + buffer_free(&vs->jobs_buffer);
> #endif
> +
> for (i = 0; i < VNC_STAT_ROWS; ++i) {
> qemu_free(vs->lossy_rect[i]);
> }
> @@ -1226,6 +1229,14 @@ static long vnc_client_read_plain(VncState *vs)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VNC_THREAD
> +static void vnc_jobs_bh(void *opaque)
> +{
> + VncState *vs = opaque;
> +
> + vnc_jobs_consume_buffer(vs);
> +}
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * First function called whenever there is more data to be read from
> @@ -2525,6 +2536,7 @@ static void vnc_connect(VncDisplay *vd, int csock)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_VNC_THREAD
> qemu_mutex_init(&vs->output_mutex);
> + vs->bh = qemu_bh_new(vnc_jobs_bh, vs);
> #endif
>
> QTAILQ_INSERT_HEAD(&vd->clients, vs, next);
> diff --git a/ui/vnc.h b/ui/vnc.h
> index 8a1e7b9..bca5f87 100644
> --- a/ui/vnc.h
> +++ b/ui/vnc.h
> @@ -283,6 +283,8 @@ struct VncState
> VncJob job;
> #else
> QemuMutex output_mutex;
> + QEMUBH *bh;
> + Buffer jobs_buffer;
> #endif
>
> /* Encoding specific, if you add something here, don't forget to
> --
> 1.7.3.4
>
>
Paolo, Anthony, Jan, are you ok with that one ?
Peter Lieve, could you test that patch ?
Thanks
--
Corentin Chary
http://xf.iksaif.net
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2] vnc: threaded server depends on io-thread, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v2] vnc: threaded server depends on io-thread, Corentin Chary, 2011/03/09
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] sockets: add qemu_socketpair(), Corentin Chary, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Corentin Chary, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Anthony Liguori, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Corentin Chary, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 2/2] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Corentin Chary, 2011/03/10
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread,
Corentin Chary <=
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/14
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/15
- [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH v5] vnc: don't mess up with iohandlers in the vnc thread, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/15
[Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/09
[Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0, Peter Lieven, 2011/03/09
[Qemu-devel] Re: segmentation fault in qemu-kvm-0.14.0, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/03/09