qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 09/11] json-lexer: limit the maximum size of a g


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 09/11] json-lexer: limit the maximum size of a given token
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 16:25:02 -0300

On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 15:00:47 -0600
Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:

> This is a security consideration.  We don't want a client to cause an 
> arbitrary
> amount of memory to be allocated in QEMU.  For now, we use a limit of 64MB
> which should be large enough for any reasonably sized token.
> 
> This is important for parsing JSON from untrusted sources.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anthony Liguori <address@hidden>
> 
> diff --git a/json-lexer.c b/json-lexer.c
> index 834d7af..3462c89 100644
> --- a/json-lexer.c
> +++ b/json-lexer.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@
>  #include "qemu-common.h"
>  #include "json-lexer.h"
>  
> +#define MAX_TOKEN_SIZE (64ULL << 20)
> +
>  /*
>   * 
> \"([^\\\"]|(\\\"\\'\\\\\\/\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\u[0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F]))*\"
>   * 
> '([^\\']|(\\\"\\'\\\\\\/\\b\\f\\n\\r\\t\\u[0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F][0-9a-fA-F]))*'
> @@ -312,6 +314,17 @@ static int json_lexer_feed_char(JSONLexer *lexer, char 
> ch)
>          }
>          lexer->state = new_state;
>      } while (!char_consumed);
> +
> +    /* Do not let a single token grow to an arbitrarily large size,
> +     * this is a security consideration.
> +     */
> +    if (lexer->token->length > MAX_TOKEN_SIZE) {
> +        lexer->emit(lexer, lexer->token, lexer->state, lexer->x, lexer->y);
> +        QDECREF(lexer->token);
> +        lexer->token = qstring_new();
> +        lexer->state = IN_START;
> +    }

Entering an invalid token is an error, we should fail here. Which brings
two features:

 1. A test code could trigger this condition and check for the specific
    error code

 2. Developers will know when they hit the limit. Although I don't expect
    expect this to happen, there was talking about adding base64 support
    to transfer something (I can't remember what, but we never know how the
    protocol will evolve).

Also, by testing this I found that the parser seems to get confused when
the limit is reached: it stops responding.

> +
>      return 0;
>  }
>  




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]