Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-9p: move 9p files around

[Aneesh Kumar K.V]

On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 08:57:48 -0700, Venkateswararao Jujjuri <address@hidden> 
wrote:
> On 04/27/2011 03:33 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011 09:03:56 +0200, Jan Kiszka<address@hidden>  wrote:
> >> On 2011-04-27 08:53, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >>> Now that we start adding more files related to 9pfs
> >>> it make sense to move them to a separate directory
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V<address@hidden>
> >>> ---
> >>>   Makefile.objs                        |   10 +++++++---
> >>>   Makefile.target                      |    6 ++++--
> >>>   configure                            |    2 ++
> >>>   {hw =>  fsdev}/file-op-9p.h           |    0
> >>>   fsdev/qemu-fsdev.h                   |    2 +-
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-debug.c      |    0
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-debug.h      |    0
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-local.c      |    0
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-posix-acl.c  |    2 +-
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-xattr-user.c |    2 +-
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-xattr.c      |    2 +-
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-xattr.h      |    0
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p.c            |    0
> >>>   hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p.h            |    2 +-
> >>>   14 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >>>   rename {hw =>  fsdev}/file-op-9p.h (100%)
> >>>   rename hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-debug.c (100%)
> >>>   rename hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-debug.h (100%)
> >>>   rename hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-local.c (100%)
> >>>   rename hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-posix-acl.c (99%)
> >>>   rename hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-xattr-user.c (98%)
> >>>   rename hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-xattr.c (99%)
> >>>   rename hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p-xattr.h (100%)
> >>>   rename hw/{ =>  9pfs}/virtio-9p.c (100%)
> >> That's a good chance to split up this file, move virtio_9p_get_config
> >> into a separate one and build the large virtio-9p.c as part of hwlib
> >> while keeping the new file target-specific. I've some hack for this
> >> lying around, but now that you are already at it...
> >>
> > How about doing the below patch also and move all those device specific
> > stuff to virtio-9p-device.c and rest in virtio-9p.c ?
> I think this goes on top of your old patch. I am ready to give pull to 
> Anthony with old patch.
> May be this can go in next pull?
> 

Yes the two new patches can go later 

-aneesh