[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] hpet 'driftfix': add code in hpet_timer(
From: |
Glauber Costa |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] hpet 'driftfix': add code in hpet_timer() to compensate delayed callbacks and coalesced interrupts |
Date: |
Wed, 04 May 2011 10:36:12 -0300 |
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 06:09 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 04:06:59AM -0400, Ulrich Obergfell wrote:
> >
> > Hi Marcelo,
> >
> > > Whats prev_period for, since in practice the period will not change
> > > between interrupts (OS programs comparator once, or perhaps twice
> > > during bootup) ?
> >
> > 'prev_period' is needed if a guest o/s changes the comparator period
> > 'on the fly' (without stopping and restarting the timer).
> >
> >
> > guest o/s changes period
> > |
> > ti(n-1) | ti(n) ti(n+1)
> > | v | |
> > +---------------------+------------------------------+
> >
> > <--- prev_period ---> <---------- period ---------->
> >
> >
> > The idea is that each timer interrupt represents a certain quantum
> > of time (the comparator period). If a guest o/s changes the period
> > between timer interrupt 'n-1' and timer interrupt 'n', I think the
> > new value should not take effect before timer interrupt 'n'. Timer
> > interrupt 'n' still represents the old/previous quantum, and timer
> > interrupt 'n+1' represents the new quantum.
> >
> > Hence, the patch decrements 'ticks_not_accounted' by 'prev_period'
> > and sets 'prev_period' to 'period' when an interrupt was delivered
> > to the guest o/s.
> >
> > + irq_delivered = update_irq(t, 1);
> > + if (irq_delivered) {
> > + t->ticks_not_accounted -= t->prev_period;
> > + t->prev_period = t->period;
> > + } else {
> >
> > Most of the time 'prev_period' is equal to 'period'. It should only
> > be different in the scenario shown above.
>
> OK, makes sense. You should probably reset ticks_not_accounted to zero
> on HPET initialization (for example, to avoid miscalibration when
> kexec'ing a new kernel).
Everybody resetting the machine in anyway is expected to force devices
to be reinitialized, right ?
I may be wrong, but I was under the impression that kexec would do this
as well. In this case, the reset function should be enough.
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/5] hpet 'driftfix': add code in hpet_timer() to compensate delayed callbacks and coalesced interrupts, Ulrich Obergfell, 2011/05/05