qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Memory API


From: Anthony Liguori
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Memory API
Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 11:33:25 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10

On 05/18/2011 10:23 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
The tricky part is wiring this up efficiently for TCG, ie. in QEMU's
softmmu. I played with passing the issuing CPUState (or NULL for
devices) down the MMIO handler chain. Not totally beautiful as
decentralized dispatching was still required, but at least only
moderately invasive. Maybe your API allows for cleaning up the
management and dispatching part, need to rethink...

My suggestion is opposite - have a different MemoryRegion for each (e.g.
CPUState::memory). Then the TLBs will resolve to a different ram_addr_t
for the same physical address, for the local APIC range.

I don't understand the different ram_addr_t part.

The TLB should dispatch to a per-CPU dispatch table. The per-CPU should dispatch almost everything to a global dispatch table.

The global dispatch table is the chipset (Northbridge/Southbridge).

The chipset can then dispatch to individual busses which can then further dispatch as appropriate.

Overlapping regions can be handled differently at each level. For instance, if a PCI device registers an IO region to the same location as the APIC, the APIC always wins because the PCI bus will never see the access.

You cannot do this properly with a single dispatch table because the behavior depends on where in the hierarchy the I/O is being handled.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]