On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:06 AM, malc <address@hidden> wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 1:51 AM, malc <address@hidden> wrote:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Blue Swirl wrote:
Use TCG_REG_CALL_STACK instead of TCG_REG_R1 etc. for consistency.
This i'd rather avoid.
Why? In addition to the consistency among targets, a magic
constant is
replaced with a symbol which improves the documenting abilities and
readability of the code.
Makes it harder to read for me personally.
What about other people reading the code? With TCG_REG_CALL_STACK it's
pretty clear what is the purpose of the register, with '1' it is
assumed that the reader happens to know it. I don't think the exact
value is so interesting, or is register 1 somehow different from
others?