qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] fine grained qemu_mutex locking for


From: Paolo Bonzini
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] fine grained qemu_mutex locking for migration
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:39:54 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110707 Thunderbird/5.0

On 07/29/2011 10:57 PM, Umesh Deshpande wrote:
+    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();

      while (s->state == MIG_STATE_ACTIVE) {
          if (migrate_fd_check_expire()) {
+            qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
              buffered_rate_tick(s->file);
+            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
          }

          if (s->state != MIG_STATE_ACTIVE) {
@@ -392,12 +396,11 @@ void migrate_fd_begin(void *arg)

          if (s->callback) {
              migrate_fd_wait_for_unfreeze(s);
+            qemu_mutex_lock_iothread();
              s->callback(s);
+            qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();
          }
      }
-
-out:
-    qemu_mutex_unlock_iothread();

I think it's clearer to unlock explicitly around the waiting points (see review of 1/3). In fact, I think you're working around the busy wait by accessing s->state outside the lock, right? I don't think this is provably safe; moving the knowledge of the thread entirely within buffered_file.c also fixes this, because then the lifetimes of the thread and the QEMUFile are much clearer.

Thanks,

Paolo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]