qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] Replace VMSTOP macros with a proper QemuSta


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/7] Replace VMSTOP macros with a proper QemuState type
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 11:06:18 -0300

On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 12:17:55 +0200
Jan Kiszka <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 2011-08-04 11:55, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 08/03/2011 06:17 PM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> >> @@ -9,6 +9,20 @@
> >>   #include "notify.h"
> >>
> >>   /* vl.c */
> >> +
> >> +typedef enum {
> >> +    QSTATE_DEBUG,         /* qemu is running under gdb */
> >> +    QSTATE_INTERROR,      /* paused due to an internal error */
> >> +    QSTATE_IOERROR,       /* paused due to an I/O error */
> >> +    QSTATE_PAUSED,        /* paused by the user (ie. the 'stop'
> >> command) */
> >> +    QSTATE_PREMIGRATE,    /* paused preparing to finish migrate */
> >> +    QSTATE_RESTVM,        /* paused restoring the VM state */
> >> +    QSTATE_RUNNING,       /* qemu is running */
> >> +    QSTATE_SAVEVM,        /* paused saving VM state */
> >> +    QSTATE_SHUTDOWN,      /* guest shut down and -no-shutdown is in
> >> use */
> >> +    QSTATE_WATCHDOG       /* watchdog fired and qemu is configured to
> >> pause */
> >> +} QemuState;
> >> +
> >>   extern const char *bios_name;
> >>
> > 
> > Why "QemuState"?  In general, "qemu" can be inferred from the fact that
> > we're in qemu.git.  Suggest "RunState".

Having a RUNSTATE_PAUSED seems a bit strange when reading it for the
first time. But I chose QemuState because I didn't have other options,
so I'm fine with RunState.

> > Second, these states can coexist.  A user may pause the VM
> > simultaneously with the watchdog firing or entering premigrate state. 
> > In fact, with multiple monitors, each monitor can pause and resume the
> > vm independently.
> > 
> > So I think we should keep a reference count instead of just a start/stop
> > state.  Perhaps
> > 
> > vm_stop(QemuState s)
> > {
> >     ++stopcount[s];
> > }
> > 
> > vm_is_stopped()
> > {
> >     for (s in states)
> >           if (stopcount[s])
> >               return true;
> >     return false;
> > }
> 
> I don't think this makes sense nor is user-friendly. If one command
> channel suspends the machine, others have the chance to subscribe for
> that event. Maintaining a suspension counter would mean you also need a
> channel to query its value.

Agreed. Can be done incrementally if this turns out to be needed.

> 
> IMHO, there is also no use for defining stopped orthogonally to
> premigrate and other states that imply that the machine is stopped.
> Basically they mean "stopped for/because of X". We just need to avoid
> that you can enter plain stopped state from them by issuing the
> corresponding monitor command. The other way around might be possible,
> though, if there are race windows.
> 
> Jan
> 
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]