[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] e1000: CTRL.RST emulation

From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] e1000: CTRL.RST emulation
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:32:53 +0300
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 27 September 2011 12:25, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> > e1000 spec says CTRL.RST write should have the same effect
> > as bus reset, except that is preserves PCI Config.
> > Reset device registers and interrupts.
> >
> > Fix suggested by Andy Gospodarek <address@hidden>
> Doesn't this have the same effect as this patch:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108673/

Right except mine clears the interrupts as well.
I missed that patch - what happened to it in the end?

> except that it's harder to read because it's moved a lot
> of code around in the file?
> (I think you have an extra qemu_set_irq() call in there,

The device spec says we should reset the interrupts.
So it seems necessary.

> actually. But it was hard to find.

I probably should split the patch out
1. code movement
2. code change

Forward declarations just to work around random
placement of functions in file seem wrong -
why not order the functions sensibly instead?

> Also your code has the
> bug that was in earlier revisions of Anthony's patch where
> after doing the reset you fall through and allow other bits
> in the ctrl register to be set.)
> -- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]