qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Is realview-pb-a8 fully supported ?


From: Francis Moreau
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Is realview-pb-a8 fully supported ?
Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2011 18:22:00 +0200

On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 9 October 2011 13:06, Francis Moreau <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 12:48 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 9 October 2011 09:28, Francis Moreau <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> I'm trying to use qemu to emulate the ARM realview-pb-a8 and more
>>>> specifically I'd like to boot using the SD interface.
>>>>
>>>> However it looks like some devices are not emulated at all on this
>>>> platform.
>>>
>>> Correct; not all devices are emulated.
>
>> May I suggest to report that a platform is partially supported when
>> doing "qemu -M ?"
>
> I suspect that (in the sense you seem to be using "partially supported")
> would cover almost all the platforms QEMU supports. Device and board
> modelling is not trivial, and the typical state is that devices may be
> missing, or have unimplemented features, or have bugs.
>
> The platform is supported in the sense that if you report regressions
> (ie things that used to work and have broken) I will look at them, and
> if you submit patches to improve it I will review them.
>

Ok.

>> However, those are still missing:
>>
>> amba_device_register failed to register dev:smc
>> amba_device_register failed to register dev:sctl
>> amba_device_register failed to register dev:wdog
>> amba_device_register failed to register dev:sci0
>> amba_device_register failed to register dev:ssp0
>> amba_device_register failed to register fpga:aaci
>
> Do you actually *need* these devices?

Not really, but it took me some times to realize why booting from SD
interface did work with qemu. So I prefered asking to avoid been hit
by another missing devices later.

> If so, you're
> going to need to model them. (except "fpga:aaci", which
> is the PL041 audio; there are patches going through review
> for that currently.) But in general Linux will quite happily
> boot even if some of the minor devices are missing.
>
>> In your opinion, which plateform should I use to get a fully supported
>> platform based on ARMv7 cpu ?
>
> I would recommend vexpress-a9 over realview-pb-a8 simply because
> it's newer; nobody cares much about pb-a8 hardware any more.
> The actual level of support (in terms of which devices are
> present and how fully featured they are) is about the same, though.
>

Ok, I'll use this platform from now.

Thanks for your advices.
-- 
Francis



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]