[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V4] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation
From: |
Jan Kiszka |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V4] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 10:31:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/2.0.0.12-1.1 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
On 2011-10-14 09:43, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 10/14/2011 02:49 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-10-14 08:36, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>> On 10/14/2011 01:53 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> On 2011-10-14 02:53, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As explained in some other mail, we could then emulate the missing
>>>>>> kernel feature by reading out the current in-kernel APIC state, testing
>>>>>> if LINT1 is unmasked, and then delivering the NMI directly.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Only the thread of the VCPU can safely get the in-kernel LAPIC states,
>>>>> so this approach will cause some troubles.
>>>>
>>>> run_on_cpu() can help.
>>>>
>>>> Jan
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ah, I forgot it, Thanks.
>>>
>>> From: Lai Jiangshan <address@hidden>
>>>
>>> Currently, NMI interrupt is blindly sent to all the vCPUs when NMI
>>> button event happens. This doesn't properly emulate real hardware on
>>> which NMI button event triggers LINT1. Because of this, NMI is sent to
>>> the processor even when LINT1 is maskied in LVT. For example, this
>>> causes the problem that kdump initiated by NMI sometimes doesn't work
>>> on KVM, because kdump assumes NMI is masked on CPUs other than CPU0.
>>>
>>> With this patch, inject-nmi request is handled as follows.
>>>
>>> - When in-kernel irqchip is disabled, deliver LINT1 instead of NMI
>>> interrupt.
>>> - When in-kernel irqchip is enabled, get the in-kernel LAPIC states
>>> and test the APIC_LVT_MASKED, if LINT1 is unmasked, and then
>>> delivering the NMI directly. (Suggested by Jan Kiszka)
>>>
>>> Changed from old version:
>>> re-implement it by the Jan's suggestion.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <address@hidden>
>>> Reported-by: Kenji Kaneshige <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>> hw/apic.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> hw/apic.h | 1 +
>>> monitor.c | 6 +++++-
>>> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>> diff --git a/hw/apic.c b/hw/apic.c
>>> index 69d6ac5..9a40129 100644
>>> --- a/hw/apic.c
>>> +++ b/hw/apic.c
>>> @@ -205,6 +205,54 @@ void apic_deliver_pic_intr(DeviceState *d, int level)
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#ifdef KVM_CAP_IRQCHIP
>>
>> Again, this is always defined on x86 thus pointless to test.
>>
>>> +static inline uint32_t kapic_reg(struct kvm_lapic_state *kapic, int
>>> reg_id);
>>> +
>>> +struct kvm_get_remote_lapic_params {
>>> + CPUState *env;
>>> + struct kvm_lapic_state klapic;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static void kvm_get_remote_lapic(void *p)
>>> +{
>>> + struct kvm_get_remote_lapic_params *params = p;
>>> +
>>> + kvm_get_lapic(params->env, ¶ms->klapic);
>>
>> When you already interrupted that vcpu, why not inject from here? Avoids
>> one further ping-pong round.
>
> get_remote_lapic and inject nmi are two different things,
> so I don't inject nmi from here. I didn't notice this ping-pond overhead.
> Thank you.
Actually, it is not performance-critical. But there is a race between
obtaining the APIC state and testing for the NMI injection path. So it's
better to define an on-vcpu LINT1 NMI injection service.
>
>>
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +void apic_deliver_nmi(DeviceState *d)
>>> +{
>>> + APICState *s = DO_UPCAST(APICState, busdev.qdev, d);
>>> +
>>> + if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
>>> + struct kvm_get_remote_lapic_params p = {.env = s->cpu_env,};
>>> + uint32_t lvt;
>>> +
>>> + run_on_cpu(s->cpu_env, kvm_get_remote_lapic, &p);
>>> + lvt = kapic_reg(&p.klapic, 0x32 + APIC_LVT_LINT1);
>>> +
>>> + if (lvt & APIC_LVT_MASKED) {
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (((lvt >> 8) & 7) != APIC_DM_NMI) {
>>> + return;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + cpu_interrupt(s->cpu_env, CPU_INTERRUPT_NMI);
>>
>> Err, aren't you introducing KVM_CAP_LAPIC_NMI that allows to test if
>> this workaround is needed? Oh, your latest kernel patch is missing this
>> again - requires fixing as well.
>>
>
>
> Kernel site patch is dropped with this v4 patch.
>
> Did you mean you want KVM_CAP_SET_LINT1 + KVM_SET_LINT1 patches?
> I have made them.
OK, so this is going to be applied on top? Then I take this remark back.
Jan
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Jan Kiszka, 2011/10/10
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Andreas Färber, 2011/10/10
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2 V2] qemu-kvm: Synchronize kernel headers, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/11
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 V2] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 V2] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Jan Kiszka, 2011/10/11
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 V2] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2 V2] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Jan Kiszka, 2011/10/14
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V4] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V4] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Jan Kiszka, 2011/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V4] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V4] qemu-kvm: fix improper nmi emulation,
Jan Kiszka <=
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2 V5] qemu-kvm: Synchronize kernel headers, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/14
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Jan Kiszka, 2011/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Jan Kiszka, 2011/10/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Avi Kivity, 2011/10/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Avi Kivity, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Jan Kiszka, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1 V5] kernel/kvm: introduce KVM_SET_LINT1 and fix improper nmi emulation, Lai Jiangshan, 2011/10/17