qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we need -no-kvm-pit and -no-kv


From: Jamie Lokier
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-kvm upstreaming: Do we need -no-kvm-pit and -no-kvm-pit-reinjection semantics?
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:39:08 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Usability. Users should not have to care about individual tick-based
> clocks. They care about "my OS requires lost ticks compensation, yes or no".

Conceivably an OS may require lost ticks compensation depending on
boot options given to the OS telling it which clock sources to use.

However I like the idea of a global default, which you can set and all
the devices inherit it unless overridden in each device.

-- Jamie



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]