[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] qemu_next_alarm_deadline: check the expi
From: |
Stefano Stabellini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/5] qemu_next_alarm_deadline: check the expire time of a clock only if it is enabled |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 15:43:50 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/27/2012 01:26 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Also delta in qemu_next_alarm_deadline is a 64 bit value so set the
> > default to INT64_MAX instead of INT32_MAX.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini<address@hidden>
> > ---
> > qemu-timer.c | 10 ++++------
> > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/qemu-timer.c b/qemu-timer.c
> > index cd026c6..648db1d 100644
> > --- a/qemu-timer.c
> > +++ b/qemu-timer.c
> > @@ -106,23 +106,21 @@ static inline int alarm_has_dynticks(struct
> > qemu_alarm_timer *t)
> >
> > static int64_t qemu_next_alarm_deadline(void)
> > {
> > - int64_t delta;
> > + int64_t delta = INT64_MAX;
>
> I'm worried of overflows elsewhere...
I think that you are right: mm_rearm_timer and win32_rearm_timer would
overflow.
I'll just repost the patch using INT32_MAX.