|
From: | Ori Mamluk |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] replication agent module |
Date: | Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:06:11 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0.1 |
On 07/02/2012 14:40, Anthony Liguori wrote:
You've got a point there. This also goes with what Kevin wrote about splitting the IOs with a block driver and not at the generic level.On 02/07/2012 06:30 AM, Ori Mamluk wrote:it reads the image. I guess that during that period the guest runs and mayIn addition, I don't see that the listener thread holds any lock whilerace w/ this new thread. Yes - I mentioned that in the patch mail as one of the open issues. Can you direct me to the lock I need? The function I call from a new thread context is bdrv_aio_readv.One thing that has me confused about this proposal. Why not just make rehub be an iSCSI target provider and call it a day?
The main issue about it is that the Rephub also needs the other direction - to read the protected volume.
I get the feeling that with live block copy and NBD there's probably something that might fit this need, no? With a 'new' agent like I need this is relatively easily achieved by a bidirectional protocol, but I agree a more generic protocol would be more elegant, although it will probably require a socket per direction, no?
I Some smaller questions:* Is there already a working iScsi initiator as a block driver (I hope I'm using the right terminology) in Qemu, or do I need to write one? * This driver would need to be added in run-time - to allow starting to protect a running VM. Maybe via a monitor command. I guess that's OK, right? * What can you say about NBD via iScsi - with respect to our requirements- who is more mature in Qemu?
One more thing about the iScsi initiator - it will not be a standard backing for a drive, because the 'production' drive (i.e. the original image) is more important than the replicated one. This means that even though we use iScsi, this is still a replication agent - not a generic 'additional' iscsi backing.
Regards, Anthony Liguori-----Original Message----- From: Dor Laor [mailto:address@hidden Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2012 2:25 PM To: Anthony Liguori Cc: Ori Mamluk; Kevin Wolf; address@hidden Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH] replication agent module On 02/07/2012 02:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:Hi, On 02/07/2012 04:29 AM, Ori Mamluk wrote:Repagent is a new module that allows an external replication system to replicate a volume of a Qemu VM. This RFC patch adds the repagent client module to Qemu.Please read http://wiki.qemu.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch In particular, use a tool like git-send-email and split this patch up into more manageable chunks. Is there an Open Source rehub available? As a project policy, adding external APIs specifically for proprietary software is not something we're willing to do. Regards, Anthony LiguoriIn addition, I don't see that the listener thread holds any lock while itreads the image. I guess that during that period the guest runs and may race w/ this new thread. About image ID for the replication hub, you can use the VM's pid or VM's uuid paired w/ the specific disk uuid Thanks, Dor
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |