qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-ga: stub out guest-suspend* for non-linux


From: Luiz Capitulino
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qemu-ga: stub out guest-suspend* for non-linux
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:37:15 -0300

On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 14:11:53 -0500
Michael Roth <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:20:22PM -0300, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
> > On Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:54:09 -0500
> > Michael Roth <address@hidden> wrote:
> > 
> > > This currently breaks the build for BSDs.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  qga/commands-posix.c |   22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/qga/commands-posix.c b/qga/commands-posix.c
> > > index 89dde92..16737d7 100644
> > > --- a/qga/commands-posix.c
> > > +++ b/qga/commands-posix.c
> > > @@ -24,10 +24,12 @@
> > >  
> > >  #include <sys/types.h>
> > >  #include <sys/ioctl.h>
> > > +#if defined(__linux__)
> > >  #include <ifaddrs.h>
> > >  #include <arpa/inet.h>
> > >  #include <sys/socket.h>
> > >  #include <net/if.h>
> > > +#endif
> > >  #include <sys/wait.h>
> > >  #include "qga/guest-agent-core.h"
> > >  #include "qga-qmp-commands.h"
> > > @@ -542,6 +544,7 @@ int64_t qmp_guest_fsfreeze_thaw(Error **err)
> > >  #define SUSPEND_SUPPORTED 0
> > >  #define SUSPEND_NOT_SUPPORTED 1
> > 
> > Missing the macros and I think reopen_fd_to_null() is missing too, also
> > doesn't apply to latest master.
> > 
> 
> Shouldn't hurt, but yah, leaving them in is a bit sloppy.

I think letting reopen_fd_to_null() out won't actually build.

> Don't see why this wouldn't apply though... are you applying on top of
> Michal's patch?

Oh, no, I was trying to apply on master to test it... If Michal's patch
is not applied yet, then I think you should post a version that applies
on master and Michal should rebase on top of your patch.

> This patch was meant to be the guest-suspend counterpart
> rather than a standalone fix.

Yeah, I missed it. I'm sorry for that and thanks for fixing it!



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]