Re: [Qemu-devel] Memory API: handling unassigned physical memory

[Anthony Liguori]

On 05/01/2012 01:57 AM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 13:52, Mark Cave-Ayland
> <address@hidden>  wrote:
> > On 30/04/12 14:27, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter,
> >
> >
> > > > IMO the best fix is to unsysbus the device and qomify it instead.  This
> > > > way we're 100% flexible in how we can attach it.
> > >
> > >
> > > You don't need to wait for QOM to grow enough features to
> > > replace sysbus. If you don't like what sysbus_mmio_map() does, you
> >
> >
> > Oh - so does this mean that QOM is not feature-complete?
>
> At least 'Pin' class to replace GPIOs and IRQs is not in HEAD (but
> Anthony already has a tree somewhere) and I can't remember what was
> the plan for buses.

I'm planning on pushing bus support in before I freeze 1.1.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori