qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] Poking a sun4v machine


From: Artyom Tarasenko
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Poking a sun4v machine
Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 15:54:37 +0200

On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Blue Swirl <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 17:38, Artyom Tarasenko <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Andreas Färber <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Am 30.04.2012 18:39, schrieb Artyom Tarasenko:
>>>> Tried to boot QEMU Niagara machine with the firmware from the
>>>> OpenSPARC T1 emulator ( www.opensparc.net/opensparc-t1/download.html )
>>>> , and it dies very early.
>>>> The reason: in translate.c
>>>>
>>>> #define hypervisor(dc) (dc->mem_idx == MMU_HYPV_IDX)
>>>> #define supervisor(dc) (dc->mem_idx >= MMU_KERNEL_IDX)
>>>>
>>>> and the dc->mem_idx is initialized like this:
>>>>
>>>>     if (env1->tl > 0) {
>>>>         return MMU_NUCLEUS_IDX;
>>>>     } else if (cpu_hypervisor_mode(env1)) {
>>>>         return MMU_HYPV_IDX;
>>>>     } else if (cpu_supervisor_mode(env1)) {
>>>>         return MMU_KERNEL_IDX;
>>>>     } else {
>>>>         return MMU_USER_IDX;
>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>> Which seems to be conceptually incorrect. After reset tl == MAXTL, but
>>>> still super- and hyper-visor bits are set, so both supervisor(dc) and
>>>> hypervisor(dc) must return 1 which is impossible in the current
>>>> implementation.
>>>>
>>>> What would be the proper way to fix it? Make mem_idx bitmap, add two
>>>> more variables to DisasContext, or ...?
>>>>
>>>> Some other findings/questions:
>>>>
>>>>     /* Sun4v generic Niagara machine */
>>>>     {
>>>>         .default_cpu_model = "Sun UltraSparc T1",
>>>>         .console_serial_base = 0xfff0c2c000ULL,
>>>>
>>>> Where is this address coming from? The OpenSPARC Niagara machine has a
>>>> "dumb serial" at 0x1f10000000ULL.
>>>>
>>>> And the biggest issue: UA2005 (as well as UA2007) describe a totally
>>>> different format for a MMU TTE entry than the one sun4u CPU are using.
>>>> I think the best way to handle it would be splitting off Niagara
>>>> machine, and #defining MMU bits differently for sun4u and sun4v
>>>> machines.
>>>>
>>>> Do we the cases in qemu where more than two (qemu-system-xxx and
>>>> qemu-system-xxx64) binaries are produced?
>>>> Would the name qemu-system-sun4v fit the naming convention?
>>>
>>> We have such a case for ppc (ppcemb) and it is kind of a maintenance
>>> nightmare - I'm working towards getting rid of it with my QOM CPU work.
>>> Better avoid it for sparc in the first place.
>>>
>>> Instead, you should add a callback function pointer to SPARCCPUClass
>>> that you initialize based on CPU model so that is behaves differently at
>>> runtime rather than at compile time.
>>> Or if it's just about the class_init then after the Hard Freeze I can
>>> start polishing my subclasses for sparc so that you can add a special
>>> class_init for Niagara.
>>
>> But this would mean that the defines from
>> #define TTE_NFO_BIT (1ULL << 60)
>> to
>> #define TTE_PGSIZE(tte)     (((tte) >> 61) & 3ULL)
>>
>> inclusive would need to be replaced with functions and variables?
>> Sounds like a further performance regression for sun4u?
>
> There could be parallel definitions for sun4u (actually UltraSparc-III
> onwards the MMU is again different) and sun4v.
>
> At tlb_fill(), different implementations can be selected based on MMU
> model. For ASI accesses, we can add conditional code but for higher
> performance, some checks can be moved to translation time.

Can be done, but what is the gain of having it runtime configurable?

>> And would it be possible to have a different register set for an
>> inherited SPARCCPUClass ?
>> Also trap handling and related cpu registers behavior has to be quite 
>> different.
>
> Not really, we already handle some (but not all cases).

You mean by not handling AG? The UA2005 doesn't have IG and MG either,
but that's the easy part. Instead it has a few register banks
switchable with the GL register pointer.
cpu_change_pstate should probably have another parameter (new_GL)
which is only valid for sun4v.
And, depending on a trap type, env->htba has to be taken instead of
env->tbr. To me it looks like at the end do_interrupt will have less
common parts between sun4u and sun4v than specific ones.

>>> Helpers such as cpu_hypervisor_mode() will need to be changed to take a
>>> SPARCCPU *cpu rather than CPUSPARCState *env argument; as an interim
>>> solution sparc_env_get_cpu() can be used. (examples on the list for sh4)
>>>
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> --
>>> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
>>> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
>>

-- 
Regards,
Artyom Tarasenko

solaris/sparc under qemu blog: http://tyom.blogspot.com/search/label/qemu



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]