[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatt
From: |
Andreas Färber |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting) |
Date: |
Fri, 04 May 2012 03:07:46 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120421 Thunderbird/12.0 |
Am 04.05.2012 02:41, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 05/03/2012 02:58 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 9 February 2012 13:46, Anthony Liguori<address@hidden> wrote:
>>> On 02/09/2012 03:48 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>>> You buried the one truly important sentence, let me dig it out for you:
>>>>
>>>> *** Patches should always go to the mailing list ***
>>>>
>>>> Exceptions need justification. Responsible handling embargoed security
>>>> issues may qualify. Style fixes certainly not.
>>>
>>> 100% agreed.
>>
>> I don't see anything in the mailing list archives corresponding
>> to commits f05ae537, f6af014e.
>>
>> No unreviewed patches should go double when we're in hardfreeze!
>
> These patches are admittedly trivial but it is important to stress the
> point that all patches need to go on the mailing list before being
> committed.
>
> It's an important part of keeping the development process inclusive. I
> don't think it's reasonable to ask for an Acked-by on something as
> simple as indentation changes but at the same time, there's no reason
> not to just post patches.
The second patch is far from trivial!
It unneededly breaks the build on ppc hosts (during the Hard Freeze!),
so that I can no longer compile-test my patch series against PowerKVM.
Please revert immediately and either use a warning or a runtime abort.
And please use a proper commit message indicating that it affects "tcg/ppc".
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
- [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Peter Maydell, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Anthony Liguori, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting),
Andreas Färber <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Alexander Graf, 2012/05/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Blue Swirl, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Blue Swirl, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Blue Swirl, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), Blue Swirl, 2012/05/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] unreviewed commits (was: Re: Restore consistent formatting), malc, 2012/05/06