[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Current differences between qemu --enable-kvm and qemu-
Re: [Qemu-devel] Current differences between qemu --enable-kvm and qemu-kvm?
Tue, 22 May 2012 09:27:51 -0300
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); de; rv:22.214.171.124) Gecko/20080226 SUSE/126.96.36.199-1.1 Thunderbird/188.8.131.52 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666
On 2012-05-22 07:34, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-22 07:04, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Erik Rull <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> is there a summary existing that shows up the rough or actual differences
>>> between qemu --enable-kvm and qemu-kvm? I tested both versions with the same
>>> compile and start options, the CPU performance results are identical, only
>>> the bootup time of my guest system with qemu-kvm seemed to be a bit faster
>>> (not measured, it just feeled so).
> Current upstream does not enable the in-kernel irqchip of KVM by
> default. This should explain the difference in boot-up times. Try
> "-machine accel=kvm,kernel_irqchip=on". But the default will be on, just
> like in qemu-kvm, once  is merged.
>> For production KVM instances I think it still makes sense to use
>> qemu-kvm packages from your distro or qemu-kvm upstream source.
>> Jan Kiszka has reduced the delta between qemu.git and qemu-kvm.git to
>> the point where I think the list of differences is rather small -
>> maybe PCI passthrough stuff, irqfd for vhost-net (which is now also
>> being upstreamed into qemu.git), and a few other things I don't know
> Right, the list of differences is dramatically shrinking. As stated in
> , soon only PCI passthrough and legacy interface dependencies on
> qemu-kvm will be the remaining reasons to use it. If we are lucky, PCI
> passthrough will also make it into upstream for QEMU 1.2, we are working
> on this.
>> For development most patches should be against qemu.git unless they
>> have a dependency on qemu-kvm.git code.
> Yes, unless you are working on the upstream merge itself, there is
> practically no reason anymore to develop against qemu-kvm directly.
>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/91171
>  http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.kvm.devel/91026
I've added some more details on this to the QEMU wiki, see
BTW, if someone could have a look at the VGA diffs and resolve them,
that would be great. Gerd, what's the state of switching the BIOS?
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux