[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 35/41] postcopy: introduce helper functions f
From: |
Isaku Yamahata |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 35/41] postcopy: introduce helper functions for postcopy |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2012 18:48:27 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 11:34:09PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Isaku Yamahata <address@hidden> wrote:
> > +//#define DEBUG_UMEM
> > +#ifdef DEBUG_UMEM
> > +#include <sys/syscall.h>
> > +#define DPRINTF(format, ...) \
> > + do { \
> > + printf("%d:%ld %s:%d "format, getpid(), syscall(SYS_gettid), \
> > + __func__, __LINE__, ## __VA_ARGS__); \
> > + } while (0)
>
> This should be in a header file that is linux specific? And (at least
> on my systems) gettid is already defined on glibc.
I'll remove getpid/gettid. It was just for debugging in early phase.
They are not necessary any more.
> > +#else
> > +#define DPRINTF(format, ...) do { } while (0)
> > +#endif
>
>
> > +
> > +#define DEV_UMEM "/dev/umem"
> > +
> > +UMem *umem_new(void *hostp, size_t size)
> > +{
> > + struct umem_init uinit = {
> > + .size = size,
> > + };
> > + UMem *umem;
> > +
> > + assert((size % getpagesize()) == 0);
> > + umem = g_new(UMem, 1);
> > + umem->fd = open(DEV_UMEM, O_RDWR);
> > + if (umem->fd < 0) {
> > + perror("can't open "DEV_UMEM);
> > + abort();
>
> Can we return one error insntead of abort? the same for the rest of the
> file aborts.
Ok.
> > +size_t umem_pages_size(uint64_t nr)
> > +{
> > + return sizeof(struct umem_pages) + nr * sizeof(uint64_t);
>
> Can we make sure that the pgoffs field is aligned? I know that as it is
> now it is aligned, but better to be sure?
It is already done by gcc extension, zero length array.
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void umem_write_cmd(int fd, uint8_t cmd)
> > +{
> > + DPRINTF("write cmd %c\n", cmd);
> > +
> > + for (;;) {
> > + ssize_t ret = write(fd, &cmd, 1);
> > + if (ret == -1) {
> > + if (errno == EINTR) {
> > + continue;
> > + } else if (errno == EPIPE) {
> > + perror("pipe");
> > + DPRINTF("write cmd %c %zd %d: pipe is closed\n",
> > + cmd, ret, errno);
> > + break;
> > + }
>
>
> Grr, we don't have a function that writes does a "safe_write". The most
> similar thing in qemu looks to be send_all().
So we should introduce something like qemu_safe_write/read?
> > +
> > + perror("pipe");
>
> Can we make a different perror() message than previous error?
>
> > + DPRINTF("write cmd %c %zd %d\n", cmd, ret, errno);
> > + abort();
> > + }
> > +
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void umem_read_cmd(int fd, uint8_t expect)
> > +{
> > + uint8_t cmd;
> > + for (;;) {
> > + ssize_t ret = read(fd, &cmd, 1);
> > + if (ret == -1) {
> > + if (errno == EINTR) {
> > + continue;
> > + }
> > + perror("pipe");
> > + DPRINTF("read error cmd %c %zd %d\n", cmd, ret, errno);
> > + abort();
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (ret == 0) {
> > + DPRINTF("read cmd %c %zd: pipe is closed\n", cmd, ret);
> > + abort();
> > + }
> > +
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + DPRINTF("read cmd %c\n", cmd);
> > + if (cmd != expect) {
> > + DPRINTF("cmd %c expect %d\n", cmd, expect);
> > + abort();
>
> Ouch. If we receive garbage, we just exit?
>
> I really think that we should implement error handling.
>
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct umem_pages *umem_recv_pages(QEMUFile *f, int *offset)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + uint64_t nr;
> > + size_t size;
> > + struct umem_pages *pages;
> > +
> > + ret = qemu_peek_buffer(f, (uint8_t*)&nr, sizeof(nr), *offset);
> > + *offset += sizeof(nr);
> > + DPRINTF("ret %d nr %ld\n", ret, nr);
> > + if (ret != sizeof(nr) || nr == 0) {
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + size = umem_pages_size(nr);
> > + pages = g_malloc(size);
>
> Just thinking about this. Couldn't we just decide on a "big enough"
> buffer, and never send anything bigger than that? That would remove the
> need to have to malloc()/free() a buffer for each reception?
Will try to address it.
> > +/* qemu side handler */
> > +struct umem_pages *umem_qemu_trigger_page_fault(QEMUFile *from_umemd,
> > + int *offset)
> > +{
> > + uint64_t i;
> > + int page_shift = ffs(getpagesize()) - 1;
> > + struct umem_pages *pages = umem_recv_pages(from_umemd, offset);
> > + if (pages == NULL) {
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < pages->nr; i++) {
> > + ram_addr_t addr = pages->pgoffs[i] << page_shift;
> > +
> > + /* make pages present by forcibly triggering page fault. */
> > + volatile uint8_t *ram = qemu_get_ram_ptr(addr);
> > + uint8_t dummy_read = ram[0];
> > + (void)dummy_read; /* suppress unused variable warning */
> > + }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Very Linux implementation specific.
> > + * Make it sure that other thread doesn't fault on the above virtual
> > + * address. (More exactly other thread doesn't call fault handler with
> > + * the offset.)
> > + * the fault handler is called with mmap_sem read locked.
> > + * madvise() does down/up_write(mmap_sem)
> > + */
> > + qemu_madvise(NULL, 0, MADV_NORMAL);
>
> If it is linux specific, should be inside CONFIG_LINUX ifdef, or a
> function hided on some header.
Good idea.
> Talking about looking, what protects that no other thread enters this
> function before this one calls madvise? Or I am losing something obvious?
It is assumed that only main thread calls this function via iohandler.
> > +
> > +struct umem_pages {
> > + uint64_t nr;
> > + uint64_t pgoffs[0];
> > +};
> > +
>
> QEMU really likes typedefs for structs.
>
> Later, Juan.
>
--
yamahata
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/41] arch_init: factor out setting last_block, last_offset, (continued)
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 12/41] arch_init: factor out setting last_block, last_offset, Isaku Yamahata, 2012/06/04
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 36/41] postcopy: implement incoming part of postcopy live migration, Isaku Yamahata, 2012/06/04
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 41/41] migration/postcopy: add movebg mode, Isaku Yamahata, 2012/06/04
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 40/41] migrate: add -m (movebg) option to migrate command, Isaku Yamahata, 2012/06/04
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 37/41] postcopy: implement outgoing part of postcopy live migration, Isaku Yamahata, 2012/06/04
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 35/41] postcopy: introduce helper functions for postcopy, Isaku Yamahata, 2012/06/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/41] postcopy live migration, Anthony Liguori, 2012/06/04
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 00/41] postcopy live migration, Juan Quintela, 2012/06/14