qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix for qemu crash on assertion error when addi


From: Ma, Stephen B.
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Fix for qemu crash on assertion error when adding PCI passthru device.
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:42:46 +0000

Sorry for taking so long to reply.  I am new to this.  Should this patch be 
committed or just dropped


-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Kiszka [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Sunday, June 17, 2012 11:25 PM
To: Anthony Liguori
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin; 'address@hidden'; Ma, Stephen B.
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix for qemu crash on assertion error when adding PCI 
passthru device.

On 2012-06-17 16:28, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 06/17/2012 03:34 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 06:26:33AM +0000, Ma, Stephen B. wrote:
>>>
>>> Michael,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review.  I added the unparent to the qdev_free.
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>>   hw/qdev.c |    1 +
>>>   1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/hw/qdev.c b/hw/qdev.c
>>> index d2dc28b..ed1328d 100644
>>> --- a/hw/qdev.c
>>> +++ b/hw/qdev.c
>>> @@ -264,6 +264,7 @@ void qdev_init_nofail(DeviceState *dev)
>>>   /* Unlink device from bus and free the structure.  */
>>>   void qdev_free(DeviceState *dev)
>>>   {
>>> +    object_unparent(OBJECT(dev));
>>>       object_delete(OBJECT(dev));
>>>   }
>>>
>>> --
>>> 1.7.1
>>
>> Anthony, any feedback?
> 
> Yes, this is wrong.
> 
> PCI passthrough isn't in qemu.git so it's not clear to me where this 
> is happening.  Why would qdev_free be called when adding a PCI 
> passthru device?

The bug is reproducible with any in-tree device (at least PCI) that happens to 
return != 0 from its init handler.

Jan





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]